Mobile telephone masts
Questions were first raised in the 1990s as to the health impact of mobile phone masts on those living close by to them. A concentration of radio waves in the vicinity of the masts, it was feared, could have harmful effects. Indeed, there seemed a clear case to answer when studies in the late 90's and early 2000's revealed a higher than normal rate of cancer being reported in areas clustered close to mobile phone masts.
More recent studies however seem to have discredited the link. They have cited other external and environmental factors as the cause. That said, there is still no definitive proof, one way or the other. Given that many hundreds of thousands of homes across the UK reside in the radiation 'smog' surrounding mobile phone masts, should homeowners be concerned?
Living in a strong radio frequency field
'Yes', homeowners should be concerned claim Mast Sanity -- the UK's leading opposition organisation to the siting of mobile phone masts near homes and schools. They point to expert opinion and studies independent of telephone operators that cast doubt on research findings which claim to categorically deny that health risks exist from mobile phone mast radiation. The body of evidence they point to is substantial and shows that not only can radiation from mobile phone masts increase cancer risk, but exposure to the radiation can cause a wide variety of illnesses including headaches, skin rashes, nausea and epilepsy.
A petition to the Prime Minister has been organised by the group that calls on the government to put safeguards in place to ensure no persons will be harmed through radiation exposure from mobile phone handsets, masts and WiFi technology.
On the other side of the fence, the Mobile Operators Association (MOA), which represents the UK's five mobile phone networks, takes the opposite viewpoint. They cite the thirty or so studies that underline an absence of risk to the public from mobile phone radiation / mast radiation, so long as radio frequency (RF) fields are at or below the international guidelines on exposure limits -- which they are for the UK's network of base stations and masts.
But who do you believe? If you're like the majority then you're probably of the opinion that the jury's still out on making a decision! Caution on both arguments could well be the best policy - especially when powerful conglomerates have a vested interest of keeping the public in the dark, as they stand to lose potentially billions as a result of negative reports about this issue.
Protecting your property against RF emissions
If you live in close proximity to a mobile phone mast and feel the need to act against the unit's potentially harmful RF emissions, your best course of action is to form a campaign to lobby the council or local government with a view to having the mast removed or relocated. In terms of protecting your property you can reduce trespass of emissions into your rooms by lining walls with aluminium foil. Failing that you can apply a carbon paint to your walls, one variety of which claims to deflect 98% of incoming radiation from mobile phone masts. Magnetic paint may also be used to absorb radio waves and prevent them from entering your property.
So far, with the link between mobile phone mast radiation and illnesses in those living nearby still unproven by mainstream science, no real knock-on effect has been observed in the value of property in affected areas. The question is, do you gamble on staying where you are or do you move? The choice is yours.